It’s time for our annual analysis of the
Kaiser/HRET 2016 Employer Health Benefits Survey, which you can read online for free. The survey delves into employer-sponsored health coverage at 2,000 companies. In the charts below, I summarize employers’ 2016 pharmacy benefits by examining (1) cost-sharing tier structures, (2), average copayments, by formulary tier, and (3) type of cost-sharing (coinsurance and copayment).
This year’s results highlight the growing discrepancy between diseases that can be treated with traditional drugs and those that require specialty drugs. Traditional therapy classes that treat larger patient populations have multiple generic drug options and fixed dollar copayments.
By contrast, employers continue shifting the cost of specialty prescriptions to their beneficiaries. Patients taking specialty drugs face economically-debilitating coinsurance—in some cases with no limit on out-of-pocket expenses. These benefit designs essentially discriminate against the very few patients undergoing intensive therapies for such chronic, complex illnesses as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and HIV. But isn’t insurance supposed to help when things go really wrong?
Read on for full details along with some lovely tiers/tears puns.